In explaining the Victorian Education Department’s own position on secular education, they state,
“The legislation clearly states that the government school system is secular, and open to the adherents of any philosophy, religion, or faith.”
This is clearly no longer the case. As a supporter of secular education I am concerned to see these principles eroded by programs designed to reconfigure how children think and behave; Safe Schools is one such program.
When Corey Bernadi first suggested a connection between Safe Schools and Marxism, I laughed and thought his comment unhelpful. However, he appears closer to the mark than many first believed.
The Australian newspaper today published a piece where Roz Ward links Safe Schools with a political and social agenda, namely that of Marxism and same-sex marriage (Roz Ward oversees the Safe Schools program in Victoria, and she co-authored its content).
In two speeches (one in May 2013 and another in 2015), Roz Ward has explained (quoting from The Australian),
“It is a total contradiction to say we want (the) Safe Schools Coalition but you can’t get married to the person that you love,” Ms Ward told a rally in Melbourne. “(Teachers) have to work in this context where we have this state-sponsored homophobia in this discriminatory law and still fight against homophobia.
“The question of equal marriage is important in every single school that I go to, because I talk to teachers and they say to me: ‘How can we continue to fight against homophobia when the students will say to us that same-sex couples or transgender people cannot get married to the people they love? The law says it’s not equal and then we need to turn around as teachers and say: well it should be but it’s not’.”
Railing against a “push to fit people into gender constructs that promote heterosexuality’’ at a Marxist conference in Melbourne last year, she alluded that Safe Schools was part of a broader strategy to change society.
“Programs like the Safe Schools Coalition are making some difference but we’re still a long way from liberation,’’ she said. “Marxism offers the hope and the strategy needed to create a world where human sexuality, gender and how we relate to our bodies can blossom in extraordinarily new and amazing ways that we can only try to imagine today.”
According to the chief author and organiser of Safe Schools in Victoria, this program has a political and social agenda. It does not exist simply to combat bullying in schools, but is designed to instruct and influence children according to a socialist ideology, which includes strengthening the case for same-sex marriage.
In his time, Karl Marx identified a societal problem with capitalism, but his solution was flawed, and those who have followed in his footsteps have too often faulted. Marxism may advertise equality, but achieving it requires others to be silenced and marginalised. Indeed, history reveals how open-minded and constructive Marxist led societies have been: amidst all the gulags, red-book education, blood-shed and oppression, all the love and acceptance simply radiates from Karl Marx’s legacy.
In the case of Safe Schools, singling out children who may not affirm the new ‘normal’ is not only a sure path to discrimination, but the material itself expressively calls these children by derogatory terms, including ‘sexist’. Labelling children who don’t subscribe to all the values of Safe Schools is somewhat ironic and hypocritical given how the course instructs children to avoid tags; even the use of ‘boy’ and ‘girl’ is discouraged.
In contrast to this latest epiphany of Uncle Karl, Michael Jensen this week suggested a view to humanity that is far deeper and attractive. He writes,
“The Christian faith has bequeathed to our culture a great gift: the teaching that we are all made in the image of God. That concept permeates even apparently secular documents like the US Declaration of Independence. It coaches us to see humanity in the face of the other. It was this conviction that held good against the social Darwinians of the late nineteenth century, who would rather have placed people of different races on the lesser rungs of the human ladder.
Add to that the experience of Jesus Christ: rejected by his own, abandoned by his friends, convicted by a corrupt and lazy government, tortured, tormented, and killed. At the heart of the Christian faith is the sign of the cross, which calls us to remember what we human beings are capable of as well as to recall what God offers us.”
In other words, as Christians we are troubled by the fact children are bullied, including homophobic behaviour in schools. All parents drop their children at school each day hoping and expecting they won’t be mistreated. We want our schools to be safe for all children.
Can we not have in our schools a program that encourages respect and kindness, without all the add-ons that are so controversial and unnecessary?
The Victorian Education Minister, James Merlino, has this week confirmed that the program will be compulsory in all Victorian Schools by the end of 2018. But why? This is not education. This is not anti-bullying. By her own admission, Roz Ward has explained how Safe Schools is part of a broader strategy to rail against heteronormacy and to slam-dunk same-sex marriage. Again, I understand that some people will have no issue with this, but many others are concerned and are asking for a more reasonable and less politically motivated alternative.
5 thoughts on “This is not education”
The high lighted quote in your piece “Can we not have in our schools a program that encourages respect and kindness, without all the add-ons that are so controversial and unnecessary?” has reminded me of something I have found odd in the Christian response to the SSC material. That is, that nobody has said, as far as i can see, “look here is a good example of an anti-bullying programme in a christian school that looks after all our kids including the LGBT ones”. There are several networks of low fee christian schools, run largely by conservative churches in addition to the more traditional church schools,in which conservatives (for example the Presbyterians) still have influence over many.
So its a bit odd, with respect to ask “”Can we not have in our schools a program that encourages respect and kindness, without all the add-ons that are so controversial and unnecessary?” Surely we should be able to point to good examples of good practice, even if it is only one?
You make a good point.
I’m sure there are many examples of good practice in Christian schools, Church schools, and Government schools.
It would be useful to see them, although I wonder if these schools would want their programs published publicly, given the type of vitriol they’d probably receive for doing so
Always amazes me how many “Christians” are willing to break the 9th commandment to protect an obscure passage in Leviticus.
Close to 3000 citizens salute you. Thank you for confirming what any diligent parent has found out about the origins of this social engineering and cultural Marxist agenda behind the (UN)safe schools program. The main problem I have is the content of All of Us which encourages all children as young as 11 to question their gender, don’t base it on their genitals. What a can of worms?
Comments are closed.