As Zoomers try out church, many are looking toward older and more traditional churches. What is behind the growing interest in liturgical and classical churches? What are some helpful tips for choosing an authentic and legitimate church? In this episode, I explore 2 ways to assess the ‘real thing’: learning history and going back to first principles, namely the Bible.
A challenge if you live in Melbourne. A challenge no matter your age, and especially if you’re part of Generatoin Z
Be radical and read the Bible!
Check out the latest on ‘Tomorrow’s Melbourne’ and how an upsurge of Bible reading in the UK could help us take the Bible more seriously here in Melbourne
Melbourne has been rocked this week with 2 men charged with abusing little children. 1200 children are now required to be checked for STDs. Imagine the horror for these families? How do people begin to process what has happened?
In this episode of my new podcast, I want to address the question of evil, and needing a God who judges and who hates evil even more than us.
The ABC recently held a poll to discover the top 100 piano works. Thousands of music lovers, listeners, the bourgeois of Launceston, voted to see their most loved piano tunes strikes a chord near the top of the repertoire. I didn’t participate in voting but as someone who spent much of life with my fingers exercising on the keys, I took a tiny interest.
The ABC’s ‘Countdown’ list included many wonderful works for the piano, as well as the rather dull and uninspired, and then there’s piano music written for the movies! Like all pianists, I’m confident that my preferences are the genuine article and other opinions can swim around in the murky pond of lesser opinions! (this is also known as musician’s hubris!). So to redeem the piano from the Hungry Jacks of music, I’ve decided to put together the definitive list of the 10 greatest compositions for solo piano and the 10 finest piano concerti. Chamber works written for piano are a third category and one is left for another time.
Where there’s an *, it indicates that I’ve played or performed the work (or at least part of what belongs to a book or suite).
10 Greatest Works for Solo Piano
Well Tempered Clavier – J.S Bach*
Without Das wohltemperierte Klavier there would be no piano music, no Mozart or Chopin. Both books are the ultimate keyboard music, from which all the great composers look bad for education and inspiration.
2. Ballades – Chopin*
The high point of 19th Century Romanticism. Listen to Philippe Entremont’s recording; possibly my favourite music recording.
3. Piano Sonata No.29, ‘Hammerklavier’ – Beethoven.
The ultimate sonata. Turmoil on the keys!
4. Piano Sonata No. 8 in A minor, K. 310 – Mozart.
The sound of Mozart is pure and perfect.
5. Preludes – Debussy*
The soundtrack of nature with all its aromas and visuals played out on the piano
6. Goldberg Variations – J.S Bach
Simplicity and complexity weaved into perfect harmony
7. Etudes – Chopin*
Ferocious, brilliant, and sonorous
8. Sonata no.14 in C# Minor (“Moonlight”) – Beethoven *
A predictable choice but there is something about the opening movement
9. Années de pèlerinage II (Italie) S. 161: V Sonnette 104 del Petrarch – Liszt
Sparkling virtuosity
10 Preludes – Rachmaninoff *
The anti-revolutionary Russian longing for home (excluding Op23. No 5 which my teacher at the Con rightly thinks is pompous)
10 Greatest Piano Concertos
Piano Concerto no.3 in D minor, Op. 30 – Rachmaninoff
This is the ultimate pianist’s challenge.
2. Piano Concerto no.2 in C Minor, Opus 18 – Rachmaninoff
3. Piano Concerto no.20 in D Minor, KV 466 – Mozart
4. Piano Concerto No. 2 in F major, Op. 102 – Shostakovich
5. Piano Concerto no.5 Op.73 – Beethoven
it may not be the King of Concertos but it is the Emperor!
6. Piano Concerto no.3 in C major, Op. 26 – Prokofiev
A Kaleidoscope
7. Rhapsody on a Theme of Paganini, Op.43 – Rachmaninoff
Technically not a concerto, but who cares!
8. The Piano Concerto No. 1 in B♭ minor, Op. 23 – Tchaikovsky
Glorious opening minutes which become somewhat convoluted and meandering, but you never forget the power of those first pages. I remember being 4 or 5 and stopping a game of backyard cricket because the Tchaikovsky came on the radio.
9. Piano Concerto no.1 in Eb Major – Liszt
10. Piano Concerto no.1 in E Minor – Chopin
The lyricism outweighs Chopin’s inability to write orchestral parts!
There is an astonishing offering of piano music on these two lists. But perhaps I should confess, the definitive list doesn’t exist, not even for me. How does one choose between Bach, Mozart and Debussy? How is compiling a list even possible? They each bring genius of sound and thought to the mightiest of instruments. Nonetheless, on this wintery Melbourne day, this is my offering, and I suspect there would little change on a different day. The Mozart Sonata might change to another, and another 20th Century Concerto might squeeze out Liszt’s, but that’s about it.
If you’re keen to get a taste of the piano, these are my recommendations. Enjoy!
Melbourne was an exciting place to be over the weekend.
No, I’m not referring to the footy. Carlton, what are you doing to me?!
Hundreds of men attended the Belgrave Heights Men’s Convention and sat under the word with Sam Allberry and Stephen McAlpine. Lots of Churches around the city and suburbs preached Christ and believers were encouraged and non Christians were intrigued. I was at the Baptist BBQ while the Melbourne Anglican Diocese met to decide who would become the next Archbishop.
For decades the tide has been going out as the force of secularism and scepticism has claimed moral victory after intellectual triumph. And yet, left behind on the sandy shores around Port Phillip Bay isn’t the kind of happiness and freedom and contentment that we were promised. Instead, our streets and suburbs are floundering under the pressure of what is perhaps the worst mental crisis in our history, and growing social, economic, and relationship strain. My generation and my parents’ generation persist in closing the windows, locking the doors and telling the kids that there’s nothing outside; there is no God worth looking to let alone trusting for life. Not everyone is buying that script any longer. The emptying tide has left behind millions of people and exposed layers of rubbish on the sand produced by the materialist ideal.
We are not happier. We are not safer. We are not more content.
Is it surprising that we are hearing reports and stories of a gentle tide coming into shore in the UK and parts of the United States? In some parts of Asia and South America, it is a high tide with huge numbers of people, including Gen Z and younger who are becoming Christians and joining Churches and discovering that the God of the Bible is God today.
We are not seeing a fast-moving incoming tide in Melbourne, but something is happening. I know there are recent reports of baptismal floods, but I suspect some at least are spurious. Nonetheless, there is something happening. Government and academic institutions are continuing to double down on sexual ethics and religious freedom issues, progressive Churches continue to play those songs on their playlist, and yet there is a gentle counter voice that can be heard.
Anecdotally, across various Baptist churches and Anglican, in University Christian groups, and among our Orthodox and Roman Catholic friends, young adults are experiencing Christianity for the first time. They are ignoring the warning signs that my generation posted on every street corner. There is a curiosity emerging, an interest in Jesus, and an intrigue to discover the meaning of the world’s most important book: the Bible.
I wonder, if the Anglican Archbishop election is another small sign of a changing tide toward evangelical Christianity. 4 candidates were nominated for Anglican Archbishop of Melbourne; all 4 are evangelical Christians: Wei Han Kuan, Tim Johnson, Megan Curlis-Gibson, and Ric Thorpe. Someone may correct me, but this is rare and possibly the first time in many decades that all candidates are evangelical. This alone is significant and a result for which we should be thankful.
Ric Thorpe was elected on Saturday afternoon and will be installed as the new Archbishop later this year. Bishop Ric Thorpe is an Englishman with a pedigree from Holy Trinity Brompton and training at Wycliffe Hall, Oxford. He is one of the few Church of England Bishops to uphold a Christian understanding of marriage and human sexuality. He is passionate about evangelism and church planting. These are all great indicators.
Melbourne needs more churches. Melbourne needs 100s more Christ-centred, Gospel-believing and preaching, people-loving churches.
I’m not an Anglican so feel free to take my observations with the same volume of water found in a baptismal font (bad joke). My Melbourne Anglican friends are overwhelmingly encouraged and thankful for all candidates and the outcome, even as the Diocese looks over troubled waters. Like all our Christian denominations, much deep work of theological and spiritual reform needs to take place. Theological liberalism and moral progressivism is like sand in the car after a day at the beach; the granules find their way into different spots and crevices and lingers long afterwards with distraction and annoyance. The fact is, most of our churches (across denominations) are in decline, and biblical literacy and cultural understanding are shallow. That can lead to desperate pragmatism or compromise. But mission with fraudulent theology won’t save anybody, just as sound doctrine without love gives people a spiritual migraine. Church planting without the Gospel is the devil’s strategy. Who would want to be in Christian leadership today?
And yet Christ is on the throne. Evangelism and church planting and revitalisation isn’t God’s Plan B. It’s always been Plan A and there is no plan B. The Gospel remains God’s power to save. The Church is the bride and centrepiece of God’s redeeming purposes. Let’s be thankful for Christian leaders who are convinced of this and who in love can navigate our churches in the shallows and deep.
It may be that as the cultural tide withdraws, small rock pools and large ones will be left behind, and they will become safe places for people to splash and swim and come to know the God who saves. Gospel Churches may be easier to spot and more inviting for those who need rest.
I sense a quiet excitement mixed with soberness as we see the landscape before us. Did we see a glimpse of things to come this past weekend? May it drive God’s people to prayer and eagerness.
Almost as important, someone needs to nudge Ric Thorpe toward the right footy club (Carlton) and teach him how to make a decent coffee and double-check that his visa includes a condition on who to support in the Ashes later this year.
A Melbourne influencer has created a public controversy this week following her announcement on Instagram that she spent $45,000 on gender selection treatment in the United States.
Nine News reported,
“A Melbourne influencer has publicly defended her decision to go public with her choice to fly to the US to select her baby’s sex.
Caitlyn Bailey, who has two boys and a girl, flew to the US and paid $45,000 to ensure her next pregnancy, conceived through IVF, would be another girl.
The single mum has a following of more than 60,000 users on Instagram and uses her platform to promote her lifestyle and parenting journey.
‘”I chose to share my story and my journey purely because I thought if there’s people out there that it could potentially help and not feel so alone, that’s why I shared it.’
“I didn’t share it to start online arguments or have you know troll conversations, it’s just, it makes me feel sick to my stomach to think about the negative side of things, I’m all about positivity.”’
What are we to make of this woman’s choice? If there is no moral dilemma, then why has her personal decision created such public consternation?
To say that our society is confused about the unborn is an understatement. A child in the womb at 8 weeks brings excitement and joy to one mother and despondency or disappointment to another, and a child’s life is measured by the woman’s inclination and decision. Gender selection is illegal in Australia, and yet if the mother waits a matter of weeks, the child can be aborted; delayed gender selection.
We know more about pregnancy today than ever. Through science and technology, our knowledge of little ones and from the earliest moments of life is staggering. Whether it is seeing the first heartbeat at 6 weeks or the baby moving to music at 16 weeks; the old trope that he or she is nothing more than a ‘clump of cells’ can no longer be sustained. And yet, the fight for abortion rights is as loud as it has ever been.
While our society is confused about the value of the unborn, this Melbourne influencer is at least trying to be consistent. If carrying through with a pregnancy is the woman’s choice, why is it unethical for her to have that choice taken from her so early in the process and not later on? Is there something about the gender of a child that is outside the woman’s authority? I happen to think this mother’s actions are appalling, but is she not simply following through with the logic routinely applied to how we view the unborn? Yes she is, and yet her choice sits uncomfortably; we know intuitively that choosing the gender of your child is unethical and unloving and more.
Sometimes this is known as ‘designer babies’. Let’s use the older word, eugenics. And that word should cause us to shudder. And maybe that’s one reason why the consciences of many Melbournians has been pricked by this particular news story.
One reason why gender selection is outlawed in many countries is because it would lead to the mass killing of girls. Prejudice against females is as modern an issue as it was an ancient one. Modern technology gives license to patriarchal societies to eliminate unwanted girls and to preference boys as the eldest or only child. The method may have changed, but there is little moral distinction between these practices and what the Ancient Romans did when unwanted girls were born.
One of the facts that the influencer doesn’t speak to is what happens to all the embryos that don’t fit her preferred child. The typical IVF process creates multiple embryos (it doesn’t have to be done this way), and those that are male are either discarded straight away or are frozen and probably discarded later on. It’s not just a matter of choosing the gender of your child, but letting die those with the wrong gender.
The incongruity of our view of the unborn is further displayed in that this IVF procedure is known as ‘gender selection’. But aren’t we told with absolute authority that gender is not determined by biology but is about personal preference and social conditioning? It’s interesting to see how language shifts when it suits. Of course, divorcing gender from sex is a furphy and just occasionally, like today, we are reminded that this is the case.
The larger point that this case has exposed is that the argument, ‘it’s the ‘mother’s choice’ doesn’t wash when it comes to gender selection. This point is important because we are admitting that even as an embryo this life has a dignity and value already separate to that of the mother.
There are a range of emotions and expectations surrounding pregnancy: joy and fear, love and nerves. The child however is not the sum of these emotions and expectations. Every baby is a gift, whether they are a boy or a girl. Should it so matter to parents that they can assume a right to choose or dispose of a child because of their gender? Gender selection is immoral and I’m grateful it’s illegal in Australia. This law is one of those little reminders that pierce through our incongruous age.
Every child is a little miracle and deserves every chance at life and to be loved. A parent may forget, although I suspect many do not when their conscience kicks into gear, but these little ones are not forgotten by God. They are loved and welcomed by God.
We have become rather effective at playing God with children. How different does the ancient Psalm depict the worth of the child, those who are wanted and those unwanted,
“For you created my inmost being;
you knit me together in my mother’s womb.
I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made;
your works are wonderful,
I know that full well.
My frame was not hidden from you
when I was made in the secret place,
when I was woven together in the depths of the earth.” (Psalm 139:13-16)
I’m aware that any time I write about an issue such as this, there will be readers who have in the past made decisions regarding their unborn child that they know were wrong and to this day the decision haunts them. The God of the Bible shows us that he can outdo with good our worst decisions. Our wrong choices, don’t curb God’s commitment to see life win. And as the Gospel of Jesus shows us, His grace and mercy is able to forgive and heal the deepest shame and guilt. That’s the thing with our society’s doublespeak, we need to be told that we’ve done nothing wrong and yet there’s a part of us that knows otherwise.
One final word, the woman has expressed her fears of trolls. Trolling is not acceptable. Trolling masquerades as righteousness but it’s a little more a cowards way of venting and causing others to fear. It’s not the way to respond to this story or to any. Don’t be a tool. Offer a comment or critique and sign your real name to it.
For most people, 8th May 2025, will be little more than another ordinary day like yesterday and tomorrow. However, there was nothing normal about 8th May 1945.
8th May 1945 was VE Day: Victory in Europe. On that day, the Second World War in Europe came to an end. Hitler had killed himself several days earlier, and Nazism had fallen. The reign of terror that was the Third Reich had been smashed, as will all evil either in this life or at the Judgment.
The streets of Berlin were covered in rubble and the blood had not yet time to congealed. In London, Paris, and New York and in towns and villages across Europe millions experienced euphoria as the six of the most violent years in history came to a close. 60 million human beings dead; in fact, no one knows the final count. As the biggest party burst into life, many other civilians and soldiers sighed with exhausted relief. Others were caught in a state of numbness, for how can we cheer when news of the dead continued to be announced. And what of the war in the East? Japan was fighting the most bloody of retreats, island by island, and with the most costly battle yet to be fought. And no one yet knew of the atomic bomb that would dropped, not once but twice on Japanese cities. Even as the champagne flowed at Trafalgar Square and the dust settled on the road to Berlin, there was anxiety and uncertainty as Soviet Forces met their Allies.
Dr Sarah Irving-Stonebraker argues in her 2024 book, ‘Priests Of History: Stewarding The Past In An Ahistoric Age, we are unclear about tomorrow because we don’t read history. Few people are reading history and interested in the past, and few look to history in order to understand where we are today. This is to our detriment because mistakes forgotten are ones we are likely to repeat.
This week as the news reports on elections, youth crime and the footy results, the 80th anniversary of VE Day barely makes a passing remark. In parts of the United Kingdom, Europe, and elsewhere, commemoration services are being held. It is a day worth marking. No doubt speeches will be delivered and words uttered, praying that we will never see such days ever again. Few are alive today to remind us of those years and most of us already have enough stresses and dreams in life without giving recourse to what sent the world hurtling into global war. And why stare down human nature when popping another ‘soma’ does the trick!
Oppenheimer is just a movie; isn’t it?
There is once again war in Europe. Nations like Poland and Finland moving quickly to protect themselves. Peace in South East and East Asia is fragile. India and Pakistan are exchanging missiles at the moment, and Gaza remains a hellscape. The new administration in the United States is pushing buttons and creating geological earth tremors as though Dr Strange Love is decent foreign policy. Nazism is no longer silent.
Remember Thucydides.
History classes should be filling up, and schools and universities eager to learn. Read Thucydides, Caesar and Churchill. More essential, read what remains the world’s most important history book, namely the Bible. This book of history and theology and psychology and sociology provides us with a solid framework for understanding both conflict and peace, the human condition and where ultimately hope for peace is located. Perhaps the Bible is too raw in its truth-telling and too humbling for us to take it seriously.
C.S Lewis was a student. Take this quotation, for example. It shocks. It doesn’t fit the storyline we so often feed on, and yet he is closer to the truth,
“War creates no absolutely new situation: it simply aggravates the permanent human situation so that we can no longer ignore it. Human life has always been lived on the edge of a precipice.”
Rather than spilling new words to get my point across, allow me to repeat this reflection from 2021. The words are about the First World War and of my Great GrandFather who fought in France, but I suggest there are salient for what took place in 1939-45 and toward the future.
“The paradox of the human condition bewilders such inexplicable worth and wonder and yet constant and repeated reproach. The height of creative prodigy with the ability to love and show kindness, and yet in our DNA are traits that stick like the mud of Flanders, and which no degree of education or scientific treatment can excise. At the best of times, we contain and suppress such things, and in others, they explode into a public and violent confrontation. The First World War wasn’t human madness, it was calculated depravity. It was genius used in the employment of destruction. This was a betrayal of Divine duty. I am not suggesting that this war was fought without any degree of moral integrity, for should we not defend the vulnerable?
When an emerging global war sends signals of intent to its neighbours, to what point must we remain on the sideline and permit bullying and harassment? At what juncture do allies speak up as a buttress for justice but do not support words with deeds? How much politicising is mere virtual signalling?
As I consider the events surrounding William Campbell’s war, the temptation is to conclude that lessons have been learned and today we move forward with inevitable evolution. While the superficial has progressed enormously, that is with scientific, medical, and technological breakthroughs, and with cultures building bridges and better understanding differences. And yet, we mustn’t make the error in thinking that today we are somehow better suited to the task of humanity. This is an anthropological fallacy of cosmic repercussions. The bloodletting has not subsided, it’s just that we exercise our barbarity with clinical precision or behind closed doors. We continue to postulate and protect all manner of ignominious attitudes and actions, but these are often sanctioned by popular demand and therefore excused.
The world sees the doctrine of total depravity but cannot accept the veracity of this diagnosis because doing so would be leaving our children destitute, without hope for a better tomorrow. Surely wisdom causes us to look outside ourselves and beyond our institutions and authorities to find a cure that ails every past and future generation?
It does not take a prophet to understand that the world will once again serve as the canvas for a gigantic bloodstain. There will be wars and rumours of war. There will be small localised conflicts and globalisation will inevitably produce further large scale violence, perhaps outweighing the experiences of the first two world wars. We may see and even learn from the past, but we project a fools’ paradise when we envision the human capacity to finally overcome evil. Religion is often no better a repose than the honest diatribes of Nietzsche and his philosophical descendants. Religion, “in the name of God”, is often complicit with death making and at times it missing from the task of peacemaking, while other efforts are much like stacking sandbags against a flash flood.
Theologian Oliver O’ Donovan refers to the “nascent warrior culture” in the days of Israel, some fourteen Centuries before the coming of the Christ. This culture is no longer emerging but is now long tried and tested among the nations. Does war intrude upon peace? Perhaps it is more accurate to say that war is interrupted by periods of relative peace and at times by ugly appeasement. Soon enough another ideologue and another authority tests the socio-political temperature and attempts to scale the ethereal stairs of Babel.
The human predicament is perhaps a grotesque complement to the rising philosophical concerns of the late 19th Century. Karl Marx and Friedrich Nietzsche began dismantling the imago dei with new and devastating honesty. Far from discovering superior freedoms, they justified authoritarian systems of Government and the mass sterilisation of ‘lesser’ human beings. To strip humanity of its origins is to leave us destitute and blind, but admitting this truth demands an epistemic and moral humility that few are willing to accept. Nietzsche was right, at least as far as his logic is concerned, that “the masses blink and say ‘We are all equal – Man is but man, before God – we are equal.’ Before God! But now this God has died.” A contemporary of Nietsche, Anatole France retorted without regret,
“It is almost impossible systematically to constitute a natural moral law. Nature has no principles. She furnishes us with no reason to believe that human life is to be respected. Nature, in her indifference, makes no distinction between good and evil.”
If optimism seems out of place and if pessimism is a crushing and untenable alternative, where does the future lie? The lush green cemeteries of the Western Front with their gleaming white headstones convey a respectful and yet somewhat misleading definition of war. This halcyon scene covers over a land that was torn open and exposed the capacity of man to destroy. Perhaps, as a concession, the dead have received a quiet bed until the end of time, but the serenity of this sight mustn’t be misconstrued in any way to deify war or to minimise the sheer horror that befell so many. In part, we want to learn and so avoid repeating history, and yet history shouts to us a message that we don’t wish to accept.
There is an ancient wisdom that stands tall amid time. These words demand closer inspection by those seeking to exegete the past and consider an alternate tomorrow. Every step removed signals further hubris that we can ill afford, but epistemic humility and confession may well reorient toward the compass that offers peace instead of war, life instead of death, and love instead of hate.”
“Why do the nations conspire and the peoples plot in vain?
The kings of the earth rise up and the rulers band together against the Lord and against his anointed, saying,
“Let us break their chains and throw off their shackles.”
The One enthroned in heaven laughs; the Lord scoffs at them.
He rebukes them in his anger and terrifies them in his wrath, saying,
“I have installed my king on Zion, my holy mountain.”
I will proclaim the Lord’s decree:
He said to me, “You are my son; today I have become your father.
Ask me, and I will make the nations your inheritance, the ends of the earth your possession.
You will break them with a rod of iron; you will dash them to pieces like pottery.”
Therefore, you kings, be wise; be warned, you rulers of the earth.
Serve the Lord with fear and celebrate his rule with trembling.
Kiss his son, or he will be angry and your way will lead to your destruction, for his wrath can flare up in a moment. Blessed are all who take refuge in him.” (Psalm 2)