christianity

Bondi Beach Massacre: Naming the evil

/ MurrayCampbell

Josh Frydenberg addressed the media and onlookers at Bondi Beach yesterday. The former Federal Treasurer is a Jewish Australian, and one who has been raising the alarm over anti-semitism these past two years. Yesterday, he delivered a must-watch speech. I wouldn’t be surprised if Mr Frydenberg’s words are remembered in 100 years, either as a catalyst for change or as the warning that went unheeded. It wasn’t political grandstanding. There was pain in his voice, as well as anger and frustration. He gave a clarion call for Australia to rid herself of this ancient evil: antisemitism.

“Prime Minister, can’t say those words, Islamist ideology, if you can’t speak them, you can’t solve them.”

The gaslighting and bullying over the last 2 years have been staggering. Even as the blood congeals at Bondi voices are casting doubts and questions. When Dr John Dickson made a comment expressing anger at the persistent ‘tradition of violent jihad’, one prominent Sydney religious leader suggested he shouldn’t make such a link. On Tuesday, ABC’s Laura Tingle had the gall to suggest that the attack was not motivated by religion, even though the terrorists made that claim themselves with an ISIS flag draped over their car, and with Federal investigators confirming links with Islamic hate preachers in Western Sydney. 

shared by Josh Frydenberg on X

There is one word our Prime Minister has used, and it is being uttered by many politicians, religious leaders, and ordinary Australians alike is, ‘evil’.

It is evil. Name it. The targeted slaughter of Jewish men and women at Bondi Beach was an act of evil. There are many evils in our streets and suburbs, and yes in every human heart. There is something particularly abhorrent about what took place on the evening of 14th December. It is an ancient and wicked sin, and one that the world has yet to put to death. Even the murder of 5 million Jews in the holocaust was not enough to end this vile.

I would like to address the concept of evil. Why do we turn to this word, and what do we mean by it? 

Calling out certain attitudes and actions as evil is more than a gut reaction. Evil is a moral category. It requires there to be a standard of goodness and righteousness. Indeed, for evil to be anything more than a sociological label that is used to explain how we feel about bad events, evil requires there to be a good God who defines what is right and true. 

I grew up in Melbourne of the 1990s, and then in Sydney and Melbourne in the 2000s. In the society in which I walked, learned and worked, there was an underlying quiet, yet smug insistence from people too smart for themselves who alleged evil doesn’t really exist. I recall an article published by the ABC during the pandemic by a Zen Buddhist psychologist who argued that while death is not very pleasant but it’s little more than part of nature’s cycle.

Geoff Dawson asserted, 

“If one’s view of the world is based on science, we are not special, we were not placed here by a God to be the custodians of the Earth (and if we were, we have let the Almighty down big time!) and like all other species, we will have our place in the sun.

We will die out, and other, more adaptable, life forms will take our place.

The myth that we are somehow special and will continue to live forever as a dominant species is based on a deluded human-centric form of existential narcissism.

We may wring our hands and our hearts may ache at the rapid destruction of wildlife that is happening right now before our eyes, but we never seem to seriously consider that we may go the same way.”

 I guess Geoff Dawson is trying to be consistent. I quote him because his philosophical consistency is both revealing and repugnant. If all that exists in the universe is matter and mathematics, and there is no God, it is difficult to suppose there is ultimate right and wrong.  At most, what we have are little rights and wrongs, where we agree some things are unacceptable, but only because there is a group consensus, not because there is a universal truth. 

And yet we know that cannot be the case. Evil isn’t defined by a poll. Evil isn’t just a label adopted to soften the blow of what are uncomfortable but ultimately meaningless events. But to maintain the objective and universality of evil, we need a counterpoint of objective and universal truth. In other words, we need God. And not only God, but a God of utmost righteousness and goodness.

The Philosopher Alvin Plantinga explains,

”Could there really be any such thing as horrifying wickedness [if there were no God and we just evolved]? I don’t see how. There can be such a thing only if there is a way that rational creatures are supposed to live, obliged to live … A [secular] way of looking at the world has no place for genuine moral obligation of any sort … and thus no way to say there is such a thing as genuine and appalling wickedness. Accordingly, if you think there really is such a thing as horrifying wickedness (.. and not just and illusion of some sort), then you have a powerful … argument [for the reality of God.]

Without God, notions such as love, compassion and grace also lose their moorings and essential status. Without Divine orchestration, what is kindness and compassion other than an evolutionary product to help us survive as a species? They aren’t inherently good and necessary; they’re cosmic luck. They’re chromosomal, chemical and cultural byproducts of evolutionary processes.

Again, we know that such thinking is nonsense.  It’s not only cognitive dissonance, but moral and existential dissonance. We know justice and compassion are more than ways of describing our preferences, just as we know evil isn’t simply a way of categorising things we hate or are afraid of.

Our world requires a God who is above us and outside the universe: A Divine Being who defines right and evil, justice and compassion and who has shaped the universe to have and need these things.

We can categorically say Islamic Jihadism is evil. We can confidently say NeoNazism is evil. Why? Because existing outside ourselves and yet imprinted into the image dei is the God of love and goodness. 

Like Sydney, Melbourne enjoys a large Jewish population. Melbourne is home to more Holocaust survivors than any other place in the world, other than Israel. Between my home and the city stand many Jewish schools and synagogues. My kids regularly played sports with and against local Jewish schools, such is the vibrant Jewish community in this part of Melbourne. 

But Melbourne, and perhaps this is also true of  Sydney,  has relied upon hubris and false piety for far too long. How different we are today from William Cooper. A Christian man and Aboriginal leader, William Cooper stood in solidarity with the oppressed. With foresight, Cooper understood the unfolding evils in Germany and spoke up when most world leaders remained silent. On December 6 1938, William Cooper led a march in Melbourne to the German Consultant, in response to the infamous Kristallnacht, and condemned the “cruel persecution of the Jewish people by the Nazi government in German.”

For all our pseudo-sophistry and boasting in our cosmopolitan and cultural greatness, travelling in our DNA are the same iniquities that have tainted all nations of old, including what was once considered the most ingenious and advanced culture in the world: Germany.  We Aussies love to sing our own praises, with this gleeful myopia that sometimes shares more in common with Nero than with  William Cooper.

This week, I am reminded of one of the books that both Christians and Jews hold as Holy Scripture, the book of Jeremiah. The prophet spoke in a time of immense upheaval and uncertainty. 

‘We hoped for peace

    but no good has come,

for a time of healing

    but there is only terror. 

You who are my Comforter in sorrow,

    my heart is faint within me.

Listen to the cry of my people

    from a land far away:

“Is the Lord not in Zion?

    Is her King no longer there?” 

“The harvest is past,
    the summer has ended,
    and we are not saved.”

Since my people are crushed, I am crushed;
    I mourn, and horror grips me.

Is there no balm in Gilead?
    Is there no physician there?
Why then is there no healing
    for the wound of my people?’

(Jeremiah 8:15, 18-22)

Months ago, I reflected on the growing expressions of hatred echoing around Melbourne, 

“The sad reality is, I don’t know if our fragile cultural cladding is able to resist the kinds of attacks on Jewish people we are now seeing. I think the jury is out, and that should cause us great concern for the future.”

Today, Jewish families around Australia are less certain about tomorrow. They are less confident and free. Their warnings and fears have become reality. That ought to bring great sadness to our land and shout a loud warning. 

And yet there remains an unwillingness to learn the lessons of history. We struggle to use the right words or even understand them, because for so long we have stripped the world of ultimate realities and truths in exchange for personal preferences.

Sunday, 14th December, saw evil in its brutal force; religious beliefs fuelling hatred and mass murder. Whether it is the result of ignorance or fear, or complicity, we have failed the Jewish community in Australia.

The words of Jeremiah resound loudly today, and yet that doesn’t have to be the end. 600 years after Jeremiah’s day, an elderly Jewish man lived in Jerusalem. We are told,

 “Now there was a man in Jerusalem called Simeon, who was righteous and devout. He was waiting for the consolation of Israel, and the Holy Spirit was on him”

His eyes saw Jesus and he exclaimed,

“Sovereign Lord, as you have promised,

    you may now dismiss your servant in peace.

For my eyes have seen your salvation,

    which you have prepared in the sight of all nations:

a light for revelation to the Gentiles,

    and the glory of your people Israel.”

One thing I do know is this: if Simeon’s assessment is true, Divine consolation can be found. As much as we need evil to be more than a gut-wrenching sensation, we need a consolation that can plumb the depths of despair and pain and bring healing. He is who I am thanking God for at Christmas. And I pray my fellow Australians, even those who disagree with me, will also come to know this Divine consolation. 

The Upside Down of Abortion ‘Care’

/ MurrayCampbell

The ABC is reporting that new Guidelines for NSW Health will crack down on hospital management who try to prevent abortions.

“Hospital managers and executives would be barred from blocking abortions because of personal beliefs, under new guidelines proposed for public health services across New South Wales.

A draft copy of the “termination of pregnancy policy directive”, obtained by the ABC, includes a new section that specifically deals with conscientious objection among those managing and administering health and hospital services.

The policy has been under review for more than a year and lays out requirements for individuals and institutions providing or assisting with abortion care.”

The ABCs language of choice is ‘abortion care’. While ‘care’ is also used in the Government Guidelines, the reporter can’t help but repeat ‘care’ more than 20 times in the article, as though saying it over and over again must make it true. But the hypnosis doesn’t work. 

It doesn’t take a genius to see that ‘abortion care’ is an oxymoron of epic proportions. Care means to provide love and kindness, whereas abortion by definition requires the taking of human life. 

Of course, ‘abortion care’, like its sister slogan ‘reproductive health care’, has become difficult to keep together as science reveals more about the little ones whose lives are removed during the early weeks and months of pregnancy. 

Photo by Melike Benli on Pexels.com

The old argument, ‘it’s a clump of cells and not a human being’, is rarely used nowadays. The proof is in the womb.  The more science reveals about life in the womb, the more we have to admit that the Biblical testimony is spot on,

‘For you created my inmost being;

    you knit me together in my mother’s womb.

I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made;

    your works are wonderful,

    I know that full well.

My frame was not hidden from you

    when I was made in the secret place,

    when I was woven together in the depths of the earth.

Your eyes saw my unformed body;

    all the days ordained for me were written in your book

    before one of them came to be’

(Psalm 139:13-17)

And yet, the commitment to uncreating this wonderful frame persists to this day. So much so that NSW Health want to force hospital employees to act against their good conscience. Can you imagine the State forcing organisations to take a life against their conscience? 

The ABC goes on to quote NSW Greens MP Amanda Cohn. Listen to the dishonest rhetoric. 

“I’ve heard about instances of conscientious objection provisions being weaponised by department managers or hospital executives to then cause a whole department or a whole hospital not to provide a service,” Dr Cohn explained.

Weaponised?  Let’s get this straight. According to Amanda Cohn, those who seek to save lives are ‘weaponising’ while those who wish to take a life are offering a service? It’s as though we’re now living in the Upside Down. It’s less George Orwell and more Aldruous Huxley. We’ve swallowed the soma. Of course my career and dreams, and lifestyle are more valuable than an unexpected baby! And we thought Molech was a demanding god!

Are we okay with the State forcing individuals to sanction the taking of human life under their care?

Meanwhile, in Victoria, pressure is mounting to expand the laws surrounding euthanasia. Sorry, ‘voluntary assisted dying’! What a surprise. Once the scent of death is caught, the bloodhounds and sharks won’t relent. In October of this year, the Victorian Parliament removed the ‘gag clause’, now giving Doctors permission to initiate conversations with patients about using euthanasia as an option for them. 

From life at its beginning and at its end, our society has snatched the key of death and now claim the right to lock and unlock.

Stranger Things may have its Vecna, who appears as kind Henry to steal the children away. We have our own Henrys, and strangely, we not only protect but praise them.

Thank God the story doesn’t end here. The way to overcome the Upside Down is staggering and the perfect salve. I’m not looking to Houses of Parliament and to street marches. Christmas, of all thing,s points us in the right direction. 

Christmas is less than 2 weeks away, the most poignant celebratory day in our Calendar. On Christmas, we celebrate the birth of a child, the child, the Son of God. We know that he was an unwanted child, so much so that the State interfered and try to have him disposed of.

God kept this little one alive. His mum and earthly dad also cared for him. Before his birth, while Mary was heavily pregnant, a Divine announcement came that shook the world and echoes with clarion goodness even today, 

“Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary home as your wife, because what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit.She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus, because he will save his people from their sins.”

People tried to take Jesus’ life. In the end, he laid down his life for the sins of the world. That not only means the God calls out insidious laws for what they are, it means the God of grace and truth can do what our society cannot. Whatever our modern Henrys allege about life and death, the reality is, the scarring and guilt stick. Bad choices remain bad, and no dose of soma pills can change what the heart ultimately knows. But Jesus can.

Many a church will read John’s Prologue over Christmas, as will we at Mentone Baptist Church. The word has not lost its necessity and grace, no matter how much our culture may wish to have God dead and buried. Think it over, 

“The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome.

The true light that gives light to everyone was coming into the world.He was in the world, and though the world was made through him, the world did not recognize him.He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him. Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God—  children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband’s will, but born of God.”

The future of the Gospel in Australia

/ MurrayCampbell

How many Reformed Evangelicals does it take to change a light bulb?

I’ll let others decide on the answer, but in June this year, a relatively rare (although becoming less rare) sight was spotted in Newtown, Sydney. Reformed Evangelical leaders from across Australia gathered to talk, listen, dream and pray.

Under an invitation from The Gospel Coalition Australia,  a coalition of Gospel minded leaders met for a Summit. That winter’s day was the second year we met, with hearts burdened and captivated.

So what, you might ask? What’s so unusual about that? Well, anyone who has tried will appreciate how hard it is to convince busy Christian leaders to give up time and travel to a strange place for a meeting where finding any tangible outcome is far from certain. It is also tricky to get Christian leaders in the same room where there is trust, theological clarity, and gospel generosity and grace.

The Gospel Coalition Australia is providing such a ballast, not so heavy and not so light. Not for a second, however, did the leaders who gathered think that other Christian groups are not doing essential Gospel ministry and mission. We recognise and praise God for the many different churches and organisations that are built on the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ and proclaiming Christ, and seeing people becoming Christians and joining His Church. 

Gospel Unity

At the same time, folk like Rory Shiner and Andrew Heard are noting a peculiar season for Reformed Evangelicals, and making the most of every opportunity is surely wise and good.

Such a Summit probably wouldn’t have taken off 20 years ago. The day in June reflects a beautiful shift among evangelicalism where some of the old tribalism and differences are being replaced with greater Gospel charity and desire to work together. Sure, we disagree on some matters, and there were certainly robust conversations. And yet, what is an Anglican or Baptist,  or Turramurra and Townsville? We are not playing golf or tennis. This is cricket, and in this team we aim to play, work, and serve together.

This kind of visible unity is now found in numerous places. I think of the Reach Australia Conference, where 1400 pastors, planters, and ministry workers converge on the NSW Central Coast from around the nation. Or the growing number of TGCA local chapters that are becoming hubs where Gospel workers across denominations meet, pray and are nourished.  And there are para-church groups like AFES that are Gospel centred hubs of mission on university campuses.

From my small corner of the country, I am seeing there is greater Gospel solidarity across the country, and what’s extraordinary is that it’s happening at a time where our society is becoming increasingly fractured, and where Christian denominations are also splintering.

The Summit resolved to create a statement that reflects what the 40+ women and men in attendance affirmed. After an initial drafting, the statement was sharpened by a small group, returned to the larger group, and is now finally released.

A prayer for Australia 

Here is the statement. Rory Shiner rightly refers to it as a prayer. This is our prayer, that under Almighty God, he will do wonderful things through his gospel for the salvation of many Australians. 

“We acknowledge God works out all things according to the counsel of his will and in his mercy saves his people through the faithful preaching of the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. 

For the glory of God, as a movement of Reformed Evangelicals in Australia, we commit to pray for and work toward a doubling (at least) of the number of gospel-centred Christians in our country over the next fifteen years.

We will pray for and work toward:

  • seeing 5% conversions (as a percentage of annual attendance in our churches and ministries)
  • the gospel going to every socioeconomic, ethnic, and community group within our nation—especially those currently under-reached. 
  • a doubling of the number of men and women with the necessary conviction, character and competency in full-time Christian ministry and missionary service.“

What do you think?

Politicians are well known for leaking. Sometimes, news is so exciting and audacious that it can’t be contained. I reckon this TGCA prayer has become one of the worst-kept not-so-secret secrets of 2025!

The 5% vision and its accompanying points have been the subject of at least 2 episodes on the Pastor’s Heart podcast, REACH Australia is already beating the drum, and both FIEC and the Sydney Anglican Diocese have adopted the goals. All this before we announced the final statement! 

People have been talking about the 5% vision for several months now. Some have come out in strong support, while others are criticising. But now we can all read it for ourselves. 

One of the positives coming from these pre-emptive discussions and announcements, and no doubt, all the conversations that are yet to take place, is that people are talking about reaching Australians with the Gospel. What a great thing to talk about! Even better, what can be more important for our prayers and hearts and imaginations and ministries than wanting people to come to know the Lord Jesus?

This prayer isn’t a one-size-fits-all approach. It comes from an awareness of growing gospel collegiability about reformed evangelicals and a conviction that we need to press on to reach Australians with the Gospel. 

Archbishop Kanishka Raffel said in his recent address to the Sydney Anglican Synod,

“The 5% number arises from a national conversation that has been initiated by The Gospel Coalition Australia across like-minded denominations. It is not a way of telling God what to do, it is a way of making every local church ask, what may we do?”

 Gospel Urgency

Amen Kanishka! Evangelism and the Great Commission is surely what we are about as churches. Everyone’s an evangelist. We live in an age of conversion: competing ideas and passions are trying to win over people all the time. We are not living in a neutral space where there is no convictions and calls to repentance and faith. Whether it is prominent religions, sects or cults, or one of the various iterations of secular humanism, we live in a marketplace of ideas where groups sell their vision for the good life. Is it a market or a temple? Is it the Agora in Ephesus or Artemis? all the above! 

There are signs that in Australia, we are witnessing a rise in neopaganism and exotic spiritualities, Islam and Hinduism are growing (mostly through immigration), and there is a quiet opening of the door toward Christianity. As much as secular humanism us promised utopia without God, reality struck a blow; we can’t live without God. We need God. We are desperately praying there is a God.

The prayerful goal for 5% annual conversion growth in our churches may feel overwhelming for some; I get it. To others, it may appear modest,  but even modest goals will buck the trend in Australia. Over 15 years, 5% growth will mean a doubling in the size of our churches. That’s exciting.

 This prayer, with its Gospel goals, is as much about reminding us of the urgency of mission. Without faith in the risen Lord Jesus, God’s image bearers remain dead in their sin and facing a wrathful God. The vision sets our priorities and does so in a way that reminds us we’re not doing this alone. There may be meaningful ways in which we can support and encourage one another.

In the New Testament, we find early glimpses of how churches may serve the broader body of Christ:

  1. Providing financial gifts and support
  2. Praying
  3. Sharing trained Gospel workers
  4. Sharing theological writings (Paul expected his letters to be shared among churches. Peter refers to Paul’s writings and affirmed their divine origin and usefulness)

There is something thoroughly Christian about Christians recognising one another and seeing each other as fellow workers rather than competitors at either end of a tennis court. 

During the Summit, there was recognition of our reformed evangelical shortcomings, and there was a desire to do better. Overall, the tone of the day, which is reflected in the prayer, is one of humble confidence in God and his Gospel and stimulating conversations together.

Gospel Confidence 

We’d love to encourage others to pray this prayer. Maybe your church or group would like adopt it. We are praying this prayer because we know God is Sovereign, we are convinced  Jesus loves his church and we know the Gospel is powerful to save everyone who believes. 

Jesus promised, ‘I will build my church and the gates of Hades will not overcome it’.  We believe him. No single local church or denomination or ministry or preacher can reach every part of the Great Southland. Maybe there are ways we spur one another on in evangelism.

There are always dangers and challenges facing our churches, and most of these come from within, not outside.  We probably can’t control or influence what a State Government might do and decide around religious freedom, but we can work to ensure our churches remain true to sound doctrine and focused on the Great Commission. We will need to teach and push against strands like Christian nationalism and old school deathly liberalism. We also need to guard our hearts against materialism and gnosticism. And be enthralled by the Gospel, and hearts captured to see our church doubling over the next 15 years. Many won’t and many will, and some will grow much more. But let’s not aim for nothing and pray for nothing.

There may not be a quiet revival in Australia, but the spiritual temperature has changed a little bit. More people are asking questions, and more people are no longer satisfied with the hopelessness offered up by life without God. People are remembering that God has placed eternity in the heart.

What are we waiting for? Would you like to join us in this prayer? Let’s get on with the Lord’s work and see what great things he can do.

The heading comes from a survey conducted by TGCA earlier this year, where we invited Christians from around the country to share their ideas and dreams.

Here is the link to Rory Shiner’s TGCA encouragement to Australian Churches to join in this prayer together – https://au.thegospelcoalition.org/article/a-prayer-for-australia/

End of an era? The King and the Pope Pray Together

/ MurrayCampbell

King Charles flew to Rome to pray with Pope Leo. As reporters are headlining, this is big news. 

The BBC is making a splash, 

“King and Pope make history by praying side by side

King Charles and Pope Leo made history in the Sistine Chapel by praying side by side – a first for the leaders of the Church of England and the Catholic Church.

Under the scrutinising eyes of Michelangelo’s Last Judgment, when Pope Leo said “let us pray”, it meant everyone, including the King, closing a gap that stretched back to the Reformation in the 16th Century.”

SBS,

‘Healing of history’: King Charles and Pope Leo pray together in 500-year first’.

Photo by Ryszard Zaleski on Pexels.com

This is the first occasion in 500 years that an English monarch has so publicly aligned with a Pope. The public prayer meeting hasn’t been lost on the media or by Christians worldwide. Despite the historic nature of this meeting, it’s unsurprising, given that the ecumenical King is married to Queen Camilla (who has strong familial links with Roman Catholicism), a step that itself moves history a little closer to its medieval past. 

You may be wondering, why is a Baptist interested in this affair? Fair enough. Good question. We live in a global community, and I belong to a Christian denomination and am a child of the Reformation. No doubt many readers are pondering the significance of this public display by the King and Pope, and so sometimes the ‘outside’ voice has more liberty to make observations than those close to the crown and zucchetto. The King of England praying with the Pope is news, even if it has zero impact on what happens this Sunday at church.  It may do little to change what happens on Sunday, but the step has symbolic power.  Symbols have a habit of punching the air and giving credence to ideas. Should the Church of England one day return to Rome? Will the divorce be followed by a wedding?

Whatever this union symbolises, the King and the Pope praying is paradoxical for 2 obvious reasons:  the historical theological divide and the new theological divide.

A history of irreconcilable difference. 

The very doctrines and spiritual abuses that led to the Reformation, from Germany to England, haven’t been relinquished by Rome. Indulgences remain widely practised.  Rome continues to believe in 7 sacraments. The view that salvation and forgiveness of sins require effort and merit on behalf of the sinner is a hamstring injury that persists to this day. 

Over the 500 years since the reformers sought to purify the church in teaching and life, the Roman Catholic Church has doubled down and expanded in its theologising. For example, 1964’s Second Vatican Council, Lumen Gentium 16, states that salvation is given to the anonymous Christian, the person who doesn’t believe in Jesus the Son of God and yet is redeemed. This teaching was upheld by Pope Francis. 

It would be a wonderful sight to one day see Rome throwing off the magisterium and for genuine spiritual unity to be found in the one Lord of the church and by his Spirit. After all, the Apostle Paul spells it out for us in Ephesians ch.4,

‘There is one body and one Spirit, just as you were called to one hope when you were called; one Lord, one faith, one baptism; one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all’.

And yet, this is not the situation before us today. The differences between Rome and Canterbury are substantial and primary.  Sure, there is also common ground, but does this denude the division over how sinful human beings can be redeemed and given assurance of right standing before God?

So what is the King of England trying to achieve by visiting the Vatican and coming together with the Pope in prayer?

What political statement is being made? 

What kind of theological statement are the two heads suggesting?

It is a strange sight. 

I imagine Thomas Cranmer rolling in his grave in search of a flame to thrust in his right hand, if he were there, and Ridley sighing with frustration. Hugh Latimer’s dream became a reality, and we can dream again, ‘Be of good comfort, and play the man, Master Ridley; we shall this day light such a candle, by God’s grace, in England, as I trust shall never be put out.’

Maybe this is the point, albeit unbeknownst to the orchestrators of the King’s visit. The candle has not gone out: the UK is witnessing a resurgence of Christian interest and London churches are growing…except where the Church of England who with decision and pageantry, blew out the candle in Canterbury.

The timing of King Charles’ visit to the Vatican to pray with Pope Leo is perhaps perfect. Within weeks of the Church of England giving up on the Christian faith (thanks to the appointment of the new Archbishop of Canterbury), the head of the Church of England flies to Rome. 

Old divisions remain formally and substantially, and there is a new divide.

A new divide

Before I point out the enormous elephant standing next to the King and the Pope in the Cistine Chapel, let me clarify, I love my Roman Catholic friends. There are many Roman Catholic brothers and sisters around the world who believe the Gospel and love Jesus, and with whom we may pray and share in common. Rome in the 16th Century may have designated the Reformers as heretics, but the likes of Martin Luther and Jean Calvin saw Rome as a genuine but very sick church. 

Also this, when it comes to the Church of England, there are many faithful and amazing Parishes across the UK, and many, many faithful Anglican churches around the globe, including Australia and here in Melbourne; praise God. The Anglican Communion has, however, shifted. The seat of Canterbury is broken thanks to the ‘Living in Love and Faith’ offering and appointing one of its chief architects, Sarah Mullally, to be the new Archbishop.

It is with this issue that a new chasm between Rome and the CHurch of England has opened up. On this matter of human sexuality and marriage,  there is a fundamental disagreement between Rome and the Church of England. Canterbury has bent the knee to the cultural zeitgeist. Indeed, on this and many ethical subjects, Rome has proven more resilient than those Protestant denominations that continue to perform to the crowds, hoping for appeal and applause. Let the lesson be learned: if our theological preferences change according to seasonal cultural winds, it is only a matter of time before your church blows down!

I suspect this is one reason why young people in the West are as likely to be drawn to finding a home with Rome as they are in the local Church factory or Saint Bob Anglican.

In the last 5 years, the tissue-thin screen veiling the new atheism has been removed, and the Wizard of Oz is nothing more than a scrawny man holding a megaphone and shouting, ‘There is no God’. 50-year-old middle-class Melbourne may be stuck on this Spotify playlist, but younger generations know better. People know instinctively that there is something real and important beyond this material world.  We need it to be, because God knows, life gets pretty miserable without Divine forgiveness and hope. Take away God, and we have 8 billion people pretending there is commonality and trying to figure out a reason why brute power shouldn’t win the day. 

Of course, in the search for God, one of the mistakes we can make is to think that if it looks and smells old, it must be the real thing. I say, don’t judge a church by its smell! The Reformers were right. Does a church believe, read and teach the Bible? Do they worship the Triune God? Do they believe in the sufficiency of Christ’s substitutionary atonement death? Do they affirm the physical resurrection of Jesus? Are they denying or adding to the One Gospel? If we can tick these boxes, then they are the real church where God dwell by His Spirit. 

Part of the search for God is the persistent and right need for security and substance. We see an aged wineskin and assume its contents are priceless. As a Christian minister, I want to argue that true security and substance is found in Christ and his sufficient Gospel. This idea isn’t new and novel; the Reformation rediscovered these precious truths: justification by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone. It is, in fact, a Bible idea. If you’re looking for new old, go to the Scriptures!

Two great errors can be committed by a Church. One is to take away from the gospel in the search for relevance, and the other is to add to the gospel. In my view, the Church of England has chosen the former, and Rome, for too long, is persisting with the latter. 

Religion can be bewitching. When we catch a whiff of permission giving, we feel liberated to mould God into our own image. At the other spectrum, rules and traditions provide a temporary ballast, and yet both miss the point of Jesus. That makes this meeting between King Charles and Pope Leo both fascinating and superfluous. The power of the Gospel is found in towns throughout Nigeria and in house churches across China, and in the cities of Brazil and the suburbs of Sydney and Melbourne.

Our Bible text this Sunday is a really helpful explainer. It’s not a short read, but if you’re interested in what the Apostolic testimony has to say, it’s worth following the Apostles’ logic from beginning to end. Have a read,

“Who has bewitched you? Before your very eyes Jesus Christ was clearly portrayed as crucified. 2 I would like to learn just one thing from you: Did you receive the Spirit by the works of the law, or by believing what you heard? 3 Are you so foolish? After beginning by means of the Spirit, are you now trying to finish by means of the flesh? 4 Have you experienced so much in vain—if it really was in vain? 5 So again I ask, does God give you his Spirit and work miracles among you by the works of the law, or by your believing what you heard? 6 So also Abraham “believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness.”

7 Understand, then, that those who have faith are children of Abraham. 8 Scripture foresaw that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, and announced the gospel in advance to Abraham: “All nations will be blessed through you.”9 So those who rely on faith are blessed along with Abraham, the man of faith.

10 For all who rely on the works of the law are under a curse, as it is written: “Cursed is everyone who does not continue to do everything written in the Book of the Law.” 11 Clearly no one who relies on the law is justified before God, because “the righteous will live by faith.”12 The law is not based on faith; on the contrary, it says, “The person who does these things will live by them.” 13 Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us, for it is written: “Cursed is everyone who is hung on a pole.” 14 He redeemed us in order that the blessing given to Abraham might come to the Gentiles through Christ Jesus, so that by faith we might receive the promise of the Spirit.”

Correction: The original suggested that Queen Camilla is Roman Catholic. That is not the case. What is the case is that Her Majesty’s first marriage was to a Roman Catholic, and her children are Roman Catholic.

The Baptist Union of Victoria is suing its own theological college

/ MurrayCampbell

The Baptist Union of Victoria (BUV) and Whitley College are going to the Supreme Court. 

It is a sad state of affairs.  This isn’t anything to gloat about or take joy in. After all, the Scriptures warn us about taking fellow Christians to court.

“If any of you has a dispute with another, do you dare to take it before the ungodly for judgment instead of before the Lord’s people? 2 Or do you not know that the Lord’s people will judge the world? And if you are to judge the world, are you not competent to judge trivial cases? 3 Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more the things of this life! 4 Therefore, if you have disputes about such matters, do you ask for a ruling from those whose way of life is scorned in the church? 5 I say this to shame you. Is it possible that there is nobody among you wise enough to judge a dispute between believers? 6 But instead, one brother takes another to court—and this in front of unbelievers!

The very fact that you have lawsuits among you means you have been completely defeated already.” (1 Corinthians 6:1-7) 

The fact that the parties are heading to the Supreme Court after a 9-year process signals the nature of the breakdown. 

from the Whitley Residential College FB group

The issue relates to the sale of property used by Whitley College. The College Council sold the residential college (known as the Doughnut) and subsequently held the proceeds of the sale (and began using?). The BUV Council challenged both the sale and requested that the proceeds be turned over to the BUV in line with trust arrangements. 

Questions were raised as early as 2016 when, to people’s surprise, the property was sold without informing the BUV. For the most part, discussions have taken place quietly in meetings and privately in boardrooms (which is appropriate for initial resolution seeking). When Union delegates have raised questions at various junctions, answers have either been missing or vague. When a report was given to the Baptist Gathering last year, the matter was addressed in such convoluted legal fashion that few had any idea what was being said. 

But now, several years down the track since the property sale, the closed doors have been opened. The issue has been on the public record in the courts for some time, and more so now, through recent correspondence issued by the BUV Council and then from Whitley College Council. It is only a matter of time before the story is circulated even further.

On Wednesday, 24 September, the BUV Council sent a letter explaining that the matter is now going before the Supreme Court of Victoria. In the letter, they state, 

“Although the property was held in the name of the Baptist Union of Victoria at the time it was sold, the charitable purposes for which the property was held were unclear, as no Trust Deed had been written setting out the terms. Being the named owner of the property, the BUV operated in good faith assuming charitable trustee responsibilities.  

When the property was sold in 2016, the funds remained part of a charitable trust that the BUV must oversee. However, upon settlement of the $24.1 million, funds were directed away from the BUV as owner of the property and were not returned when requested.”

A few days (2nd October), Whitley College Chair and Principal issued a statement disputing the BUV Council’s interpretation of the situation,

“Whitley College has considered its position diligently, and has concluded that Whitley College has and continues to be the steward of these trust funds, faithfully applying them to the purposes of theological education and ministerial formation in line with the intent of those who contributed to the properties and its legacy.

While the BUV has presented a different interpretation, we are confident that the documentation demonstrates Whitley’s consistent and proper role as the steward of these resources. We believe that active involvement in the proceedings, including putting to the court an alternative position to the BUV, is the appropriate way to preserve Whitley’s access to funds, vital to its continued operations.” 

I’m not here to take sides, but rather hoping to find answers. While murmurings about the dispute have been dripping in the background for years, the fact is, most BUV members have been left in the dark, and even now, remain unaware of the issues and processes that have led to Supreme Court proceedings. We have woken to learn that we are (essentially) suing ourselves. To say that many Victorian Baptists are stunned, angered, and perplexed this week is putting it mildly; most remain unaware. Hopefully they will become aware before some journalist reports the story. Indeed, we pray that it is resolved before this happens.

I appreciate that there are legal complexities here that require lawyers and legal process. However, the parties have reached the Supreme Court stage, while the churches and delegates have had near-zero prior knowledge of the situation. That’s a problem. The Churches aren’t a third party in this dispute, but very much involved. We (the churches) are the BUV (not the Council or the College), so how can it be that things have progressed to this stage (or rather, degressed) without thorough consultation, prayer, and conversation with the churches?

Earlier this year, I learned that the BUV has already paid more than $1 million in legal fees. I now believe the figure is $2 million. In addition, Whitley College has paid a vast sum for its own legal fees. Both amounts matter because the money belongs to the Baptist family. Indeed, the land, the sale proceeds and the legal costs belong to us.

I have no doubt that all sides involved are troubled by what has transpired, but the lack of transparency is significant; the BUV is taking itself to court and only informing the family at the 11th hour.

The presenting issue is a legal one, but it is also a spiritual and moral one.  Both parties are expressing concern; however, this doesn’t mitigate the situation before us. Who will be held to account? Think of what our churches could do with $2.5+ million for mission and ministry?  

This is just one of many issues that need resolution. 

Last year, the BUV caught attention amongst the major Victorian Christian denominations with its controversial ‘Guide for the Baptist Union of Victoria’, a document produced by the Victorian Government to inform our churches how to deal with questions of sexuality and gender in our churches. On top of that, a breakaway Baptist group calling themselves the ‘Open Baptists’ are setting up an alternative association in NSW and ACT (who formed as a response to Baptists holding a biblical view on marriage and human sexuality). In Victoria, a small group of churches wanting to remain within the BUV are also joining the progressive ‘Open Baptists’. 

Whitley College has been a bone of contention among BUV churches for decades. While the College receives students from some quarters, many churches prefer to send students to evangelical colleges for training. Of note, as of this year, NSW’s Morling College has begun teaching units in Melbourne. 

Is it time to clarify the role and place of the college? 

Should questions be raised about Whitley’s association with the University of Divinity?

How is the Whitley Council accountable to the BUV (the churches) for its financial management?

Is it time to rethink property trust arrangements?

Many of these questions are not new, but are rooted in historical and theological disagreements that go back decades.  In attempting to exist as an association with a theological tent as broad as the Pacific Ocean,  it is a case about money and property that has taken us to court against ourselves. 

Again, such a thing brings sadness.  As someone who loves being a Baptist in Victoria and who longs for our churches faithful and growing in the gospel, something has gone seriously wrong, and now it’s out in the open. We rejoice in good things God is doing but the churches require full transparency and accountability from our agencies and councils. 


One thing I am confident about is that our BUV needs and appreciates the prayers of God’s people.

The ‘Prophetic Voice’

/ MurrayCampbell

I’m someone who is wary of the ‘prophetic voice’. I’m a huge believer in believing the word of the prophets, but not so much of those who attribute ‘prophetic’ to their own messaging. 

A social media post this morning used the phrase as they promoted a social agenda. Yesterday, a Facebook friend did something similar. The phrase ‘prophetic voice’ has joined the pantheon of overused and misused religious phrases.

It’s troubled me for years how the language of ‘prophetic’ is used by Christians. 

Maybe it’s the theological window from which I see the world, but for most of the time, the ‘prophetic voice was a phrase connected with progressive theology, as various thinkers and writers advocated for their views. The term ‘prophetic’ became a way of trying to authenticate a point of view, saying that God is behind this teaching. 

ABC’s religious program, God Forbid, ran a segment in 2017 that captures the classic liberal understanding of the ‘prophetic voice’. The synopsis reads,

‘Religion and politics are supposed to be separate, but some strange magnetic force keeps pulling them back together. The “prophetic voice” in Christian tradition is supposed to speak out against the abuses of the powerful, even when they’re political leaders. But does this mean the pulpit should be a platform for political views?’

I’m accustomed to this usage of ‘prophetic language.’ For example, in 201,6 I responded to a Melbourne Baptist who claimed this role for the local Baptist college, 

“Theological educators must be prepared to stand on the sidelines of the church and call it to account. Like those pesky prophets of old, courageous theologians call the church to be different than what it is, a challenge to a radical transformation and a critique of the status quo.”

Once one understood this pastor’s own convictions, for him, the prophetic voice stands against the mainstream evangelical faith and is either subverting or trying to win over Christians to a new way of thinking (usually a heterodox one). 

Which is why I replied at the time,

 ‘I guess Hananiah was a prophet of sorts! Should not prophets contend for the faith, rather than contravene the faith? In fact, professionalising prophecy was the error of the kings of Israel and Judah. While God may use a voice from the college in a ‘prophetic’ way, assuming the mantle of prophet is dangerous’.

However, over more recent years, the phrase ‘prophetic voice’ (again from my window view), has been increasingly co-opted by conservative Christians to advocate a particular posture, as well as message. It’s become one of these phrases that are thrown into the mix every second day. For example, a Facebook friend yesterday suggested Canon Press speaks with a prophetic voice on today’s issues in contrast (he believes) with TGC, that doesn’t.

There are a number of problems here (not least Canon Press).

Prophetic voice has fast become a rhetorical device, employed to legitimise or bolster the view they’re trying to prove. After all, if it’s prophetic, how can we dare oppose?

Whereas theological liberals often postulated ‘prophetic’ with their progressive message, conservatives often use ‘prophetic’ in line with a certain style of voice. It’s equating the ‘prophetic’ with a particular public posturing.

It’s also reducing the role of prophet. Prophets may challenge. Prophets might also condemn. And prophets could also give a word to console and comfort. At the very least, the ‘prophetic voice’ crowd are rather narrow in what they consider prophetic. 

In short, the ‘prophetic voice’, turns out to be a power play, as though the battering ram approach to public conversation is more godly and faithful than the one who knocks on the gate and asks to come inside and share? Or it’s like, if you don’t play the game my way, then you’re obviously not playing the game at all (which any sports coach and player will know is nonsense).

It’s confusing style, strategy and substance. 

Tim Keller famously and so helpfully explores the space known as ‘theological vision’. Between our theological foundations and our ministry practice is this in-between hermeneutical and wisdom space where we develop strategy and approach. 

In his super helpful book on Eldership, Murray Capill explains this way, 

“As Keller notes, people with the same theology can have very different ministry practice. Not all churches with reformed theology, for example, worship in the same way or do youth ministry in the same way. They can have enormously differing practice, not because of a different theology but a different vision for ministry”

This is also true when it comes to Churches and Christians doing evangelism and thinking through how to communicate Christian ethics. Some Christians are quick to judge our brothers and sisters for not adopting ‘our’ particular approach to social issues. If you’re not signing petitions and making public statements, you’re viewed with suspicion. Or perhaps public silence isn’t complicity or cowardice; it may be that a local church is doing effective gospel ministry to people in their community without making a noise about it.

For example, on the topic of abortion, the Bible is clear that killing the unborn is sin, and so the moral injunction is always clear. Christians arguing otherwise are representing God as much as Hananiah. However, is there only one way to speak about affirming life and value of unborn children? Is the only approach loud condemnatory retorts? Are churches complicit in evil if they are not actively making statements in the public square? What if a group of Christians are going about loving their neighbours and supporting pregnant mums in ways that encourage them to keep their child? That’s going well beyond virtue signalling and actually doing something. 

There is another question: what does ‘prophetic voice’ actually mean? How does one define a legitimate ‘prophetic voice’ and do we find biblical warrant for such a category today? What do the Scriptures teach? Does the office of Prophet even exist today? Is it big P Prophet or can there be little p prophets? That’s a whole other conversation. 

I think it’s problematic when people employ the phrase to add authority to their methodology for doing public theology.  We may well agree with the desired outcome and with the message, but disagree with how best to approach societal sins and problems. What ends up happening when we attach loaded language like ‘prophetic’ is that we aggravate division among gospel centred people who are otherwise dealing with and living godly lives in their particular place.

If one’s ‘prophetic’ speech creates ungospel-like division and plants seeds of suspicion in fellow Christians, it is near certain that you need to stop playing prophet.

At the very least, I’m nervous when people start attributing ‘prophetic’ to public speech because it suggests Divine authority and weight.  Yes, 1 John tells us to test the spirits. And yes, as I read the Scriptures, there are clear warnings attached to those who profess to be prophets or speaking ‘prophetically’. 

Returning to Canon Press as I wrap up, Jeremy Sexton wrote an excellent piece last week, ‘Doug Wilson is not a prophet’. It’s worth a read as a corollary to what I’ve just shared.

Charlie Kirk’s Memorial Service: an event with 2 narratives

/ MurrayCampbell

One of the largest memorial services in American history has just concluded. 

Whether we approve or not, whether we are invested in the story or not, the assassination of Charlie Kirk has dominated the news cycle and continues to do so today, with his memorial service taking place in Glendale, Arizona. 

The papers and social media are speaking about very little else. It’s not that this is the only thing that matters today, but there are moments in history that capture the public imagination in ways that coinciding events do not. 

It’s clear that there were two narratives running through the memorial service, and we mustn’t confuse them as being the same or necessarily belonging together. I want to pull apart the politics that were present and the gospel that was also present.

Several members of the Trump administration spoke, including the President. Donald Trump gave a speech in which this line has already gone viral, 

“He  [Charlie Kirk] didn’t hate his opponents. He wanted the best for them – that’s where I disagreed with Charlie. I HATE my opponent and I DON’T want the best for them.

I suspect the President said these words with a certain tongue in cheek. He was bringing a moment’s levity to what was a very sombre occasion. At the same time, that does seem to be his modus operandi. But of course, Trump’s words are not his alone; this is the norm and assumed posture across religions and ideologies and politics. Whether it is fascist or anti-fascists or left or right, and most of the middle, we think ill of those who disagree with us. That the President is saying so with knowledge of the truth isn’t laughable, it’s woeful. Doubling down on hate doesn’t resolve the growing friction and factions that are disintegrating our societies. That leaves us with a game of power where the loudest, fastest and strongest aim to take charge and impose their will on the rest of us.

Trump, the ever populist and pragmatist, may well use whatever movement that helps maintain momentum. That’s a problem, as it was when previous American presidents co-opted Christian language and concepts to promote their own ethics and agendas. 

On Saturday, I gave a lecture at the Reformed Theological College, where I outlined 3 principles for doing public theology:

  • Don’t conflate Church and state.
  • Don’t confuse common grace with particular grace.
  • Understand both the common good and the eternal good.

Christian pundits, commentators and pastors would do well and serve our congregations and the unbelieving public  by recognising and practising those distinctions. Of course, the differences are not always perfectly clear and it is true that the gospel of Jesus changes every part of us, but nonetheless, we will do well to avoid those trappings. Why? In part, because the gospel is too important to be confused or co-opted by red or blue or green. 

Merging the Christian faith with politics is fraught with dangers, and that’s true across the political spectrum. If you think that your particular position is exempt from that rule, that only exemplifies the very problem. It doesn’t mean every political ideology is equally true or good or respectable. Of course not. How we value the unborn really does matter. How we view migrants and the poor matters. And many other topics.

As I said earlier,  two narratives were present in the memorial service, and it is the second one that I hope shines the most. 

Charlie Kirk’s pastor, Rob McCoy, gave a clear presentation of the good news of Jesus. He said.

“Charlie knew … at an early age … he entrusted his life to the Savior of the World.  . Jesus came to this earth, was tempted in all ways, yet was without sin, was crucified upon the cross…”

“His blood was poured out because blood must be shed for the remission of sins…And His death upon that cross was sufficient for all the world’s sins, but only efficient for those who, like Charlie, would receive Him as their Savior.”

Can we say an Amen to those words?

Erika Kirk  then addressed the crowds and uttered the impossible word,

“I forgive him…I forgive him because it was what Christ did, and it is what Charlie would do.”

“The answer to hate is not hate,” she said. “The answer we know from the gospel is love and always love – love for our enemies and love for those who persecute us.”

This is the message our polarised world needs to hear. I thank God that God has not judged me according to every word I have said and every thought I have entertained. I am eternally thankful to God that he forgives sinners such as me. And grasping this gospel does something to us, where Trump’s words disappear and where love and forgiveness take shape.

What is so sad and troubling is that I know our culture well enough to see how this is going to play out in the media and social media: most people will simply double down on their prior commitments and attitudes. People are so entrenched in their ideological preferences that we will read the room as our glasses are glued onto our faces, and we are unable to see any other perspective. MAGA supporting Aussie conservatives will criticise me for my posture here and progressive Aussies will criticise me for not damning Charlie Kirk to hell alongside the President. 

Reality is almost always more complicated and nuanced. One does not need to elevate Charlie Kirk to the status of Stephen (Acts 6) or label him ‘ult right’. The Christian truth is that sinners are saved by grace alone on account of the perfect sacrifice of Jesus alone. Anything else is hubris.

Here is a thought: regardless of our political leanings, if God uses the gospel preached at Charlie Kirk’s funeral to convince some people of God’s saving news through Jesus, will we rejoice or will we resent & grumble like Jonah in Ninevah?

Nicola Olyslagers wins gold and shows us so much more

/ MurrayCampbell

The mystery of Christianity’s ongoing relevance in Australia continues. 

Shining through the dark clouds and rain of Tokyo last night was an Australian woman. It wasn’t her winning the high jump at the Athletics World Championship that so much elevated the spotlight (as impressive as this is) but how Nicola Olyslagers pointed her praise and joy to God. 

“And every time that I was jumping. It was just worship. I was like, let’s go. And so even if waiting and out there in the rain, I have such a joy because I know these moments are forever, the gold medal was the added bonus.”

She’s right, it was worship. It was worship not because her performance was outstanding (as it was) or because of her world-class athletic ability, but because Nicola Olyslagers was using her gift in delight of and for glory of God.  The Apostle Paul describes the entire Christian life as a living sacrifice of worship to God. It is a life of thanksgiving and joy to and for the God who made us and whose Son gave everything for our redemption. 

It’s not only the Ancient Greeks who deified their athletes. Australians raise our athletes to a bar that they, nor anyone, can measure up to, whether it’s sporting successes or their personal lives. We stick them on a mantle and throw garlands of gushing praise that would make Hercules blush.

There is something humbling and attractive when winners don’t point to themselves. How interesting it is to hear athletes directing praise not toward themselves but to God. In Western countries like Australia, we pride ourselves in the so-called decline of religion in general, and Christianity specifically. We preach how we have built an alternative society in the vein of John Lennon’s hopeless ‘Imagine’. But as we’re discovering, this secular humanism is more like Camus’ Myth of Sisyphus. Except, Sisyphus is no longer pushing the boulder uphill; it’s fast chasing him down the hill, and yet strangely Sisyphus is shouting,  ‘Look at me, I’m free!’

No matter how we try to squeeze out or sanitise Jesus, he won’t be locked in a cultural box, but in so many areas of Australian life, and yes, even among our athletes, this Jesus is making an appearance. Think of Geelong’s Ollie Dempsey, who is playing in the AFL Grand Final this Saturday, or Gary Ablett Jnr, Labuschagne and a host of NRL players. 

Nicola Olyslagers’ words may appear strange to many of our ears, partly because God is the idea we are trying hard to leave behind. Who needs God today? We’ve also accepted a popular myth; God is baggage that keeps us from having success and happiness. Nicola Olyslagers is one of may athletes at this year’s World Championships showing us otherwise. 

It is one thing to compete for self-satisfaction or actualisation. It is another thing to represent one’s country. It is reaching beyond the stars when athletes strive and exert for the glory of God. It’s not that the last of these is the least or cancels out the love of sport and the honour of running, jumping and throwing for your country. Competing for God raises the bar, not the bar of expectation, but the bar of realised contentment and happiness. 

Think of it this way, if competing for yourself brings about a certain but limited happiness, and competing for others brings a higher level of wonder, then to jump or run for God’s pleasure is the greatest pleasure of all.

“God made me fast. And when I run, I feel His pleasure,” so said Eric Liddell, the 400m gold medalist from the 1924 Paris Olympics Games. 

At the 2021 Tokyo Olympic Games Nicola Olyslagers shared, 

“I think as a teenager I was always an outcast; and I got welcomed into a faith community that loved me. And I just remember encountering god’s love and it changed the way I thought of myself – as a misfit why was I created so tall and stuff –  and it gave me passion and purpose to use it.

“In 2017, it was my big moment when it flicked the switch and I decided to pursue God over sport.- whatever comes from sport is a bonus, but I am already complete and perfect and loved as a person regardless of it.

“That just allowed me to soar over high jump bar and not be scared anymore because I am loved and that is the most important piece.”

There are extraordinary athletes who follow Jesus, and there are extraordinary athletes who do not. This is the case in every field of endeavour. Some of the most brilliant minds in the world today are followers of Jesus, while others are not. Many of history’s most influential thinkers were professing Christians, and others not. Today, in the fields of medicine, law, science, music, film, and economics, there are men and women who profess the name of Jesus, and there are men and women who do not.

The difference doesn’t depend on a person’s intellect or effort, but in the category that is greater than all others. Neither is the distinguishing characteristic success, as though Christians are more likely to win Word Championships or unbelievers are more likely. 

One of the lessons here is that you don’t need to sacrifice God for sporting achievement. You don’t need to ditch God in order to find success. We are not required to ignore God in order to find our truest self. Nicola McDermott and Sydney McLaughlin are among the many athletes who prove this myth to be false. And what these athletes have shared is a message of good news that surpasses sporting achievement. Eric Liddell who felt God’s pleasure as he raced to gold, also said this, “Many of us are missing something in life because we are after the second best.” 

The Apostle Paul once wrote a letter to a young man. He used a sporting analogy to describe the greatest race worth running. 

“ I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith.  Now there is in store for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous Judge, will award to me on that day—and not only to me, but also to all who have longed for his appearing.”

You see, Christianity’s ongoing relevance in Australia isn’t a mystery. My generation may be stuck with ‘Imagine’ on repeat, but Zoomers are looking for meaning and realisation beyond the low and crumbling ceiling we call ‘self-actualisation’. 

No doubt many young Aussies are dreaming about future sporting success. Many more are thinking about the future and considering the possibilities before them. We do not need to make the mistake of locking God out of life. Indeed, through Jesus Christ, he promises something of eternal meaning, joy and satisfaction. A few may eventually win a World Championship medal or AFL Grand Final, but let’s not miss out because we are after the second best.

The Beatitudes are a word for our time

/ MurrayCampbell

The assassination of Charlie Kirk on 10th September will bring unspeakable grief to those who knew and loved him.  His death is emblematic of the age in which we are sadly living. Not even an hour was permitted to pass without tirades of opinions and glee expressed online.

People are defending the shooter, even celebrating the murder. Many others dare to say that Charlie Kirk is simply a victim of his own making, while others again try to play the shadowy middle way game of whataboutism. 

People are losing the ability and desire to talk to one another about life’s biggest issues. People enraged by hardship and perceived injustice (or real injustice) drink from the fever-inducing cup that is easily found among online socials, justifying and fuelling hatred for the other.

The city of Melbourne, every weekend it seems, now witnesses protests, vile speeches, and violence. Victorian Police are right now preparing for and dreading another day of protest on Saturday. These thousands are but a tiny few of the many more who express their anger over on Bluesky, X and Facebook.

Photo by freestocks.org on Pexels.com

Most people have no idea who I am and have not heard my name, and yet I have written and said enough to have my name printed in newspapers and even on the front page of The Age. The former Victorian Premier resorted to his famous slander under the Parliamentary privilege because of a view I had expressed.  I have received more than a few ‘colourful’ letters in the mail or messages on the phone. As a consequence, there have been a couple of Sundays when I have had a quiet word with the Elders, just in case someone might turn up to interrupt or protest our Sunday service. Thankfully, when someone has come as a result of something I’ve written, it is in search of a merciful God and not with an agenda to shout down a preacher.

We will not find a way forward for the common good through joining in the competing choruses online; hate breeds hate, and conspiracy is often countered with misinformation. Of course, there is much going on that is maddening, harmful and concerning. Anger has a place (God can be angry), but it mustn’t be the only key in which we speak. Indeed, how we speak and what we say really does matter. Charlie Kirk, from the little I know of him, engaged his interlocutors with grace, and yet he is now dead. Far from reasoning that kindness doesn’t work, we need to double down on grace and kindness.

I have lost count over the past 5 years of how often I have seen comments from certain Christians who self-identify with the final Beatitude (blessed are the persecuted), and subsequently use this to justify relegating the first 7 Beatitudes to the category of ‘not in season’. Peacemakers and meekness and mercy are deemed an inconvenience; how differently Jesus sees things. 

The Christian doesn’t need to second-guess how to respond to world events and how to engage with others. The Christian isn’t left without guidance and recourse. Jesus gives the believer a paradigm in the Beatitudes.

He said:

“Blessed are the poor in spirit,
    for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

Blessed are those who mourn,
    for they will be comforted.

Blessed are the meek,
    for they will inherit the earth.

Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness,
    for they will be filled.

Blessed are the merciful,
    for they will be shown mercy.

Blessed are the pure in heart,
    for they will see God.

Blessed are the peacemakers,
    for they will be called children of God.

Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness,
    for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

“Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.

The Beatitudes don’t detail how one enters the Kingdom of heaven, but the life of those who belong to this Kingdom. This posture in some ways pre-empts the final manifestation of the Kingdom by exhibiting its qualities in the here and now; to use Jonathan Leeman’s analogy, it’s much like an embassy in a foreign country.

Some Christians hold to some of the Beatitudes and play loose with others. Some of us focus on peace-making while sacrificing righteousness in order to achieve this goal. Some grab hold of righteousness with clenched fists, while ignoring how Jesus begins, with confession and contrition of our own sins. It is important to see how the Lord Jesus ties them together in an unbreakable bond.  All 8 Beatitudes belong together and work together to build godly character and a life that imitates, albeit imperfectly, the Lord Jesus.

Jesus leads us to begin with confession and contrition, acknowledging our complete dependence on God’s grace, which is his loving gift to us through the atoning death of Christ. The more we grasp the astonishing nature of God’s grace, we can no longer look at other Aussies with any disdain or wanting anything other than their good. 

I suspect some of my Christian friends believe that if we follow the first 7 Beatitudes, the outcome will be peace and happy relationships with everyone, but that’s not where Jesus leads us. He says, ‘Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.’

It is true, we can be shouted down because we’ve said stupid things, hurtful things, and said the right things wrongly; I know I’m guilty of all the above.  Nonetheless, Jesus indicates that living the Beatitudes and being concerned for God’s righteousness may still result in people being offended and not liking us and attempting to silence us. For Christians to think we can escape verses 10-12 is understandable but somewhat naive.

The Christian song sheet isn’t La Marseillaise,

‘Français, pour nous, ah ! quel outrage

Quels transports il doit exciter!

C’est nous qu’on ose méditer

De rendre à l’antique esclavage!’

If the writer or website you read regularly uses language of ‘revolution’ and ‘war’, ‘taking back’, and throwing around rage and expletives, perhaps it’s time to find a more useful read. After all, Proverbs warns us, 

“Do not make friends with a hot-tempered person,

    do not associate with one easily angered,

or you may learn their ways

    and get yourself ensnared”. (Proverbs 22:24-25)

Blessed are the poor in spirit.

Blessed are those who mourn.

Blessed are the pure in heart.

Melbourne needs Christians leaning ever closer to the Jesus of the Beatitudes. The United States and Australia need Christians who are learning to press closer to Jesus’ words, trusting him and doing as he asks. If you’re not yet convinced, then take a look at the cross. Did Jesus abandon his Beatitudes as he hung crucified? Or did he embrace them, such that he died with and for the sins of the world?

That’s the message our city and world need more than ever. That’s the life our churches need to embody more than ever. 

Church offers stunning answer for social cohesion and hope

/ MurrayCampbell

This weekend, I am having a mini break, which means it’s an opportunity to visit another church. 

I love the church where I am a member and belong, but annual leave is an opportunity to visit other churches and be encouraged by what God is doing elsewhere.

We had originally thought that we would visit one of the churches in Melbourne CBD, but knowing police are overstretched and multiple protests were being organised, we thought it best not to go. Why add to the business? And who knows how long we’d be stuck in the city while protesters blocked intersections around the CBD. 

Photo by Sora Shimazaki on Pexels.com

So we visited Mentone’s daughter church, Regeneration Church in Clayton. It was lovely to catch up with old friends and encouraging to meet around God’s word and see how the church has grown since I last visited. It was a beautiful sight: a room filled with mostly 25-year-olds and representing so many different ethnicities, from all over the world and yet with one voice praising God and enjoying a deep sense of unity in Christ. I said to the pastor afterwards, ‘here [the church] is the answer to all of the friction and suspicion and anger in our community’. 

It’s true, if you want to see a glimpse of what God is doing around the world today, go to your local church. If you wish to have a little taste of what life in eternity will be like,  drop into your local church next Sunday and see where disconnected men and women from all backgrounds, jobs, education, ethnicity are finding joy and peace and love and life together through Jesus Christ. 

Sometimes the music is happening, sometimes it’s out of tune. Sometimes the coffee is proper Melbourne, most of the time it isn’t. Sometimes the kids are noisy; often they are. The building’s architecture may be plain or striking, the preacher a great storyteller or simple words explaining the Scriptures. In these many different settings, from Clayton to Camberwell, from Pakenham to Preston, and from Mentone to Melton, church is like a breath of fresh air compared to the anx and rage filling our streets. 

What a contrast with the clashing protests in Melbourne city today, where protests met with counter-protests, one volume of insult matched with further insult and even assault. Yes, many are probably marching for a myriad reasons, concerns over housing and cost of living, and fear of the unknown. But with the surprise element of boiling water burning you, these protests were already marked with signs of what they were about. When a protest is arranged under the banner, ‘stop mass immigration’, and then days out it’s described as defending ‘white heritage’ and denouncing Chinese and Indians in our country, of course, the march was going to go off the rails. So when a known neo-nazi is given a microphone and addresses the crowd from the steps of Parliament House, to the cheers of people below, what were you expecting to see? 

A few days ago, Victorian Police expressed concerns that to deal with these protests, they were forced to take away resources from their search to apprehend a man who murdered two of their own and seriously wounded another only 5 days ago. Why would we create further strain on our police after the shocking week they have endured? And then, at the protest in Adelaide, a poster appeared, supporting the alleged police murderer.

Melbourne’s new Lord Mayor wants to claim the title of the ‘optimistic city’, but Melbourne is anything but optimistic or happy. Melbourne has turned into the nation’s protest capital, with weekly interruptions by protests and marches, often promoting the most insidious of causes. Our city is experiencing tumultuous divisions and doubts and fears. One solution often produces another misstep and further erodes public confidence and our social cohesion is increasingly tenuous. We are no longer the city we once were. 

Jesus once warned, 

“There will be signs in the sun, moon and stars. On the earth, nations will be in anguish and perplexity at the roaring and tossing of the sea. People will faint from terror, apprehensive of what is coming on the world, for the heavenly bodies will be shaken.” (Luke 21)

Tired of bad news? Exhausted by the negativity and fear? There is someone to whom we can turn. I’ve said it before, and I will keep on saying it: there is good news. There is really good news, and it can already be seen and experienced in Melbourne.  There is something beautiful and good and happy taking place across our city where people from all manner of backgrounds are finding not a feeling of optimism but a happy and certain hope. To be sure, it won’t make the newspapers of 6pm news; good news stories don’t sell. But boy, do we need a better story than the ones filling every breaking news. As Jesus explained, what we get to see in our churches is tasted and seen in a million different cities and towns around the world and in a thousand languages and on a billion faces, 

“This is what is written: The Messiah will suffer and rise from the dead on the third day, and repentance for the forgiveness of sins will be preached in his name to all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.”